The teaching of Sananda, Yeshua, Jesus ...
If you were born into a Christian culture like me, I guess the following will surprise you, perhaps shock you.
I personally cannot keep silent about the fruit of my discoveries.
In his youth, Jesus followed the teaching of healing given by the Essenes. Their extremely sophisticated therapeutic approach was exercised both on the physical body and on the chakras and the various energy bodies. She was using the power of energy / light to dissolve energy blockages, toxic bonds, negative thought forms or spiritual intrusions, whether these were in the physical body or in the patient's aura.
But for a complete healing to take place, this therapeutic approach involved the patient and not in any way: it invited him to bring to light, to bring to his consciousness, the circumstances of creation, e.g. an energy blockage to encourage him to an attitude of benevolence towards himself and to forgive himself. It was all about helping the patient to grow in awareness and love ...
Also, the message of Jesus, as a preacher, was no different from what is written here on conscientious work:
* bring to light all that separates us from WHO we are in the depths of us, of our divine nature;
* evolve towards more self-love, wisdom and inner peace;
* walk towards our inner light and radiate ever more love for others, for humanity ...
Lift this stone (ourselves), observe the hidden face, clean it, allow it to shine ... Find our child's soul ... Be benevolent and show empathy and generosity towards our fellow human beings ...
Make divine Light and Love triumph by focusing on the personal journey made by each human being ...
A bombshell
We can still be surprised that the substantive core of Jesus' message has been "forgotten"?
The many channels of Sananda that I have read in my spiritual research and the messages that I myself have received all point in this direction (conscientious work).
Is it not therefore legitimate to be surprised at the discrepancy between the message of the Catholic Church and the channels attributed to Jesus?
It must be remembered that the transcribed messages are sifted through the filter of a human being. Always. And whatever the religions.
For what purposes? No one is obliged to adhere to my hypothesis but I deliver it to you: if the teaching of Jesus had been faithfully transcribed and if God is in each of us, we would have needed spiritual guides (who help us on our way ) but no priests (holders of the word of God) and a wealthy Church would not have justified itself… Everything is therefore a matter of power.
Likewise, when a Church or a religion is all powerful, it imposes its truths, those decreed by God, of which it alone knows the secrets and values and does not admit questioning:
What God could want to exclude a homosexual from his community because of his preferences? Before that, what God could demand wars, slaughter and torture in his name?
The critical spirit having gained ground in our societies, many human beings have ended up turning their backs on religion, on a religion riddled with inconsistencies and intolerance, at the same time turning away from spirituality. Because no distinction is made. Such a waste…
Let's go even further ...
Documents and films attempt to affirm the presence of Mary Magdalene alongside Jesus.
From the channels I read on the subject and the answers I myself received, Jesus and Mary Magdalene were very companions in life. They were very close and often together.
Mary Magdalene and Jesus lived the divine Union. She taught the sacred feminine, the sacred masculine and how to achieve Divine Union. What has it been reduced to? In the rank of prostitute ...
If it had been respected, the evolution of humanity and in particular the place of the feminine in the world would undoubtedly have been very different.
Divine Union is a springboard in spiritual elevation. And from the information that I received from my spirit guides, all of the ascended masters, absolutely all, have experienced divine union. This Union, as I have clarified in this article, could have been spiritual only.
If Divine Union had been taken seriously, it is the complementarity of the sacred feminine and masculine that would have been celebrated and that too would have changed the face of the world.
